Skip to content

title: "DFT Automaton — Schematic Specification" description: "Visual schematic and layer topology specifications for the Digital Fabrica Theory relational finite state automaton." layout: doc status: "canonical-figure-spec" claim_boundary: "Visual schematic specification only. Demarcates visual state transition topology from empirical physical validation." ​

DFT Automaton ​

Status Boundary

This work is part of the authorial PHYSICA / Science of Fabric Reality corpus. It is presented as a research framework, formalization target, computational model, or theoretical synthesis unless explicitly marked otherwise. It is not presented as accepted physics, external consensus, or experimentally confirmed science.

Scientific Purpose ​

Defines the visual and structural requirements for representing the Digital Fabrica Theory (DFT) relational finite state automaton within the formal framework.

Concepts Visualized ​

  • Relational State Automaton · Discrete state machine MDFT=(S,Σ,δ,s0,A) operating on woven lattice configurations.
  • Admissibility Indicators · State-local indicator functional Iadm(s) pruning non-admissible transitions.
  • Automorphism Invariance · Groupoid transition symmetries preserving trace dual reciprocity.

Symbols Visualized ​

  • SDFT, δ(s,σ), Iadm(s), Tinv, Σtrans

Equations Referenced ​

Required SVG Layers ​

  • base-topology: The structural node and state transition graph.
  • interaction-vectors: Admissible transition arrows, symbol emissions, and pruning boundaries.
  • labels-and-nodes: Mathematical state labels, transition triggers, and admissibility tags.

Caption ​

Figure: Schematic representation of the DFT Relational Automaton, depicting state-local transition pruning and automorphism preservation.

Construction Notes ​

Do not use generic raster images. The final SVG must strictly adhere to the mathematical and topological constraints defined in the corresponding route.

Route Bindings ​

Interpretation Boundary ​

This figure serves as a formalization target and visual aid for the authorial model. It must not be interpreted as empirical proof or accepted physics.