Collaboration Modes
Structured pathways for academic research, laboratory testbeds, formal mathematical verification, and institutional alliances.
Ivan Pasev collaborates with university departments, independent research institutes, experimental laboratories, and open-source foundations. Collaboration is distinguished strictly from commercial consulting: it focuses on shared epistemic objectives, co-authorship, public peer review, and sovereign scientific infrastructure.
1. Five Collaboration Frameworks
Academic & Theoretical Research
Joint theoretical investigations on relational field dynamics, discrete metric-measure Dirichlet forms, and multi-scale quantum field frameworks.
- Co-authorship on theoretical manuscripts and whitepapers.
- Joint mathematical derivation and operator formulation.
- Harmonization with consensus physical comparators.
Experimental & Laboratory Testbeds
Independent laboratory evaluation of pre-registered empirical predictions and spectroscopic comparators.
- Atomic ionization comparators (NIST ASD baselines).
- Strong-field high-harmonic generation cutoff scaling.
- Cryogenic directional vacuum thermophysics metrology.
Formal Verification & Lean 4
Machine-checked formalization campaigns translating axiomatic foundations into interactive proof assistant code.
- Lean 4 formalization of invariant preservation theorems.
- Automated proof obligation closures and lemma audits.
- Public CI validation of mathematical repositories.
Technical & Sovereign Systems
Collaborative development of invariant-governed software, verifiable state witness chains, and controlled AI execution workstations.
- Digital Fabrica Theory (DFT) reference implementations.
- CodexStation policy gating and receipt schema testbeds.
- Decentralized ledger protocols and state verification.
Institutional Programs & Alliances
Strategic institutional partnerships under the auspices of the Global Institute of Logic & Cybernetics (GILC) or partner foundations.
- Participation in the 33 active research programs and frontier targets.
- Research data governance aligned with NIST RDAF and FAIR principles.
- Open science archiving, permanent DOI registry, and transparent peer review.
2. Institutional Boundaries & Integrity
Epistemic Grounding
Collaboration inquiry, joint discussion, or research dialogue does not imply commercial partnership, legal endorsement, or validation of claims. All research output remains subject to independent peer review and open mathematical verification.
No ungrounded claims of existing corporate or university partnerships are asserted on this site. Active collaborations are bound strictly to registered evidence artifacts and formal agreements.
3. Propose a Collaboration
To discuss a research partnership, experimental testbed, or formalization project: