Spine Position
Orientation Root · About Ivan · Structured Collaboration Frameworks
Public Status Boundary. Ivan Pasev collaborates with university departments, independent research institutes, experimental laboratories, and open-source foundations. Collaboration is distinguished strictly from commercial consulting: it focuses on shared epistemic objectives, co-authorship, public peer review, and independent scientific infrastructure.
1. Five Collaboration Frameworks
Academic & Theoretical Research
Joint theoretical investigations on relational field dynamics, discrete metric-measure Dirichlet forms, and multi-scale quantum field frameworks.
- Co-authorship on theoretical manuscripts and whitepapers.
- Joint mathematical derivation and operator formulation.
- Harmonization with consensus physical comparators.
Experimental & Laboratory Testbeds
Independent laboratory evaluation of reproducible empirical predictions and spectroscopic comparators under JCGM uncertainty budgets.
- Hydrogen 2S–8D Doppler-free precision spectroscopy (0.85 kHz budget).
- Atomic ionization comparators (NIST ASD baselines).
- Cryogenic directional vacuum thermophysics metrology.
Formal Verification & Lean 4
Machine-checked formalization campaigns translating axiomatic foundations into interactive proof assistant code in Lean 4.
- Lean 4 formalization of invariant preservation theorems.
- Automated proof obligation closures and lemma audits.
- Public CI validation of mathematical repositories.
Technical & Sovereign Systems
Collaborative development of invariant-governed software, verifiable state witness chains, and controlled AI execution workstations.
- Digital Fabrica Theory (DFT) reference implementations.
- CodexStation policy gating and receipt schema testbeds.
- Decentralized ledger protocols and state verification.
Institutional Programs & Alliances
Strategic institutional partnerships under the auspices of the Global Institute of Logic & Cybernetics (GILC) or partner research foundations.
- Participation in active research programs and frontier targets.
- Research data governance aligned with NIST RDAF and FAIR principles.
- Open science archiving, permanent DOI registry, and transparent review.
2. Priority Laboratory Outreach: AMO Rydberg Precision Spectroscopy
We invite experimental AMO groups operating precision atomic hydrogen or metastable beam facilities to collaborate on an independent remeasurement of the atomic hydrogen
Protocol Specifications & Design Target
- Primary Transition: Atomic Hydrogen
( , two-photon Doppler-free). - Target Uncertainty: Baseline
· Design Goal ( JCGM budget) · Stretch Forecast . - Core Technology: Cryogenic supersonic atomic beam (
, ), active 8-electrode 3D field reversal nulling ( ), and in situ Stark calibration.
Four Mainstream Scientific Motivations
Independent Replication of Contested 2S–8D Result:
In 2022, Brandt et al. (Science 377, 655–660) measured, yielding —standing in combined tension with CODATA 2018 and muonic hydrogen spectroscopy. Precision metrology requires independent verification. Proton-Radius & Rydberg-Constant Concordance:
Measuring an angular momentum-state ( ) decouples the electron wave function from the nuclear core via the centrifugal barrier, rotating the Yukawa response function by relative to existing -state ladders and breaking practical rank deficiency. Bound-State QED in High-
-States:
Enables rigorous tests of two-loop Bethe logarithms () and radiative recoil terms free from nuclear charge radius ambiguities. Model-Independent Fifth-Force Tomography:
Probes hypothetical scalar/vector mediators across the nanometre regime (mediator mass; Compton wavelength).
Model-Blind Data Handoff & Outcome Guarantee
To eliminate cognitive bias toward either CODATA agreement or new-physics signals:
- Software Blinding: Laboratory DAQ injects a pseudo-random blinding offset
unknown to experimental operators. - Frozen Covariance: All systematic corrections, Stark extrapolations, and covariance matrices are cryptographically signed before unblinding.
- Neutral 3-Branch Decision Tree:
- Branch A (
, Anomaly Confirmed): Direct empirical discovery of non-local mediator interactions. - Branch B (
, CODATA Agreement): Establishes world-leading exclusion boundaries across the window. - Branch C (
, Discrepant): Isolates state-specific high- quantum interference or stray field phenomena.
- Branch A (
| Dispatch Resource | Target / File | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Appendix | AMO Rydberg Spectroscopy Appendix → | Complete 280-line technical specification, Gauss–Laguerre integrals, and error budgets. |
| Interactive Cockpit | KP Spectroscopy Cockpit & Tomography → | Interactive parameter space explorer and response kernel visualizer. |
| Results Ledger | Null Exclusion Benchmark AMO-H-EXCL-95 → | Formal registration of the 95% CL null exclusion benchmark. |
3. Institutional Boundaries & Integrity
Epistemic Grounding
Collaboration inquiry, joint discussion, or research dialogue does not imply commercial partnership, legal endorsement, or validation of claims. All research output remains subject to independent peer review and open mathematical verification.
No ungrounded claims of existing corporate or university partnerships are asserted on this site. Active collaborations are bound strictly to registered evidence artifacts and formal agreements.
4. Propose a Collaboration
To discuss a research partnership, experimental testbed, or formalization project:
5. Canonical Continuations
Direct Contact
Initiate structured technical or scientific inquiry via the contact gateway.
Engagement Pathways
Comprehensive problem router and structured engagement formats.
Programs Atlas
Active research portfolio and dependency architecture across eight canonical domains.
GILC Institutional
Global Institute of Logic & Cybernetics institutional charter and research mission.