FQFT Errata — Corrections & Verification Ledger
Public Corrections, Mathematical Notes & Continuous Verification Log
Spine Position
Research Root · FQFT Frontier · Errata & Verification Notes
Institutional Authority: Global Institute of Logic & Cybernetics (GILC)
Parent Framework: Fractal Quantum Field Theory (FQFT)
Corpus Layer: Epistemic Hygiene & Errata Management
1. Public Provenance & Errata Protocol
The FQFT Errata register tracks mathematical typos, formula adjustments, parameter clarifications, and computational corrections across all published monographs and companion materials.
FQFT Errata - Corrections and Verification Notes
Prepared route for corrections, updates, verification notes, and versioned changes across the FQFT series.
Required Verification
This route remains a placeholder until the following items are manually verified against the public record:
- exact title
- local PDF
- Zenodo record
- DOI
- affected papers
- version history
Related Routes
Review Boundary
Errata route is a correction pathway, not a claim that all issues are resolved.
This page is a prepared public route. It does not claim that the paper has been verified, peer-reviewed, accepted, or externally validated.
2. Errata Classification & Intake Protocol
Reported issues and revisions are classified according to epistemic impact:
| Severity Class | Issue Type | Action Protocol | Public Record Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class A | Typographical / Notation | Corrected in next minor revision of markdown source. | Recorded in errata log. |
| Class B | Numerical / Constant Drift | Re-run computational pipeline; update Companion. | Updated with provenance hash. |
| Class C | Derivation Step Gap | Formalize in Lean 4 theorem suite; issue formal addendum. | Tagged in Formalization Targets. |
| Class D | Falsification / Empirical Tension | Register anomaly in Falsifiability Matrix. | Full disclosure under pre-registered criteria. |
3. Epistemic Claim Boundary
Claim Boundary
The errata register ensures continuous mathematical hygiene, transparency, and self-correction across the research program. Maintenance of an active errata log is an invariant requirement of scientific rigor, but does not substitute for external peer review or empirical falsification.
4. Canonical Continuations
| Destination | Scope & Focus | Primary Route |
|---|---|---|
| FQFT Theoretical Frontier | Research program overview and monograph index | Open FQFT Frontier |
| FQFT Paper I | Technical formulation and field equations | Open Kernel Route |
| Prediction Ledger | 7-tier prediction taxonomy and empirical ledger | Open Prediction Ledger |
| Falsifiability Matrix | Failure criteria and adversarial null tests | Open Falsifiability Matrix |
| Computational Companion | Numerical execution protocol and Zenodo record | Open Companion |
| Publications Registry | Public provenance registry and archived papers | Open Publications |
FQFT Paper Series
The public corpus is organized as a spine, not as a loose archive. Continuity does not establish proof completion, peer review, or accepted physics.