Skip to content

Simulation Candidates Registry ​

Candidate Computational Models, Discrete State Machines & Invariant Stress Testing

Spine Position

Mathematics Root · Simulation Telemetry · Candidate Models

Status Boundary

This work is part of the authorial PHYSICA / Science of Fabric Reality corpus. It is presented as a research framework, formalization target, computational model, or theoretical synthesis unless explicitly marked otherwise. It is not presented as accepted physics, external consensus, or experimentally confirmed science.

1. Computational Simulation Pathway ​

The computational simulation pathway (C2–C3) provides numerical stress-testing and empirical falsification testbeds on the computational axis (C) for mathematical assertions across the Science of Fabric Reality. Alongside formal interactive theorem proving in Lean 4 (35 machine-verified proofs across 11 modules), candidate propositions are translated into executable discrete state machines (e.g. cellular automata, lattice field solvers, and operator resolvent packages) to validate structural invariants and numerical stability.

Primary Candidate Classes ​

  • Recursive Observer Knots: Topologically validating that Kn+1 can be constructed from Kn under localized projection constraints.
  • Trace Reciprocity Flow: Numerically validating bilinear trace pairing rules and dual involution through discrete state transitions.
  • KP Field Propagation: Finite-difference solvers checking wave propagation and energy conservation across elliptic-hyperbolic grids.
  • Recursive Intelligence Networks: Multi-agent graph diffusion testing convergence to invariant equilibrium states.

TIP

Target Architecture: Language-agnostic (Motoko / Rust / Python CA prototypes) mapped to deterministic validation receipts.


2. Interactive Runtime & Candidates Table ​


3. Prototype Traces & Benchmarks ​

Auditable computational traces and invariant stress-test results:

Note: Simulation traces record diagnostic verification runs; they do not constitute physical experiment data or ungrounded proof claims (ACTIVE_P4_SEALS = 0).


4. Canonical Continuations ​

DirectionTarget ResourcePurpose
Simulation LabCanonical Simulation Atlas Hub15-point typed simulation contract, solver families, and pnull=0.62 benchmark
Simulation BridgeFormalization ↔ Simulation BridgeDiagnostic mapping between Lean 4 proofs and discrete numerical solvers
Proof GatewayLean 4 Formalization Roadmap35 machine-verified theorem records and lemma dependency DAGs
Falsifiability MapFalsifiability Index & Negative TheoremsQuantitative failure criteria and singular Fisher information bounds
EXTERNAL REFERENCE